LavaPicks
Head to head · Running Shoes

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M vs Nike Zoom Alphafly Next% 3 PRM

Both products have identical sentiment scores on Reddit.

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M
#4 in Running Shoes

Adidas

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M

$150.00

100

Pros

  • +Full lightstrike pro foam
  • +Improved fit with different laces
  • +Good value for money
  • +Softer ride

Cons

  • −Upper looks worn/damaged easily
  • −Unstable
  • −Not suitable for runners needing stability
  • −Lower mileage for heavier runners/forefoot strikers
“The EVO SL makes a lot of other shoes look overpriced. Evo softer and easier to pick up speed. Surprised it lasted so well over 1,000km.”
Full reviewAmazon · $150.00
Nike Zoom Alphafly Next% 3 PRM
#9 in Running Shoes

Nike

Nike Zoom Alphafly Next% 3 PRM

$284.90

100

Pros

  • +Well-liked

Cons

  • −Narrow
  • −No benefit for slow paces (10 min miles)
  • −People walk in them (implies misuse or lack of benefit for some users)
“I’ve never seen a single shoe review that thought they would be any benefit at that pace [10 minute miles]. I’ve seen tons of people WALK 5ks in Alphaflys and that just blows my mind.”
Full reviewAmazon · $284.90
← Back to Running Shoes