adidas Mens Adizero Evo Sl M vs Nike Womens Vomero 18
Side-by-side comparison based on Reddit community data
#2 in Running Shoes
Adidas
adidas Mens Adizero Evo Sl M
$150.00
100/100Excellent
100% positive0% neutral0% negative
Pros
- +Full lightstrike pro foam
- +Improved fit with different laces
- +Good value for money
- +Softer ride
- +Easier to pick up speed
Cons
- -Upper looks worn/damaged easily
- -Unstable
- -Not suitable for runners needing stability
- -Lower mileage for heavier runners/forefoot strikers
“The EVO SL makes a lot of other shoes look overpriced. Evo softer and easier to pick up speed. Surprised it lasted so well over 1,000km.”
#4 in Running Shoes
Nike
Nike Womens Vomero 18
$9.97
100/100Excellent
100% positive0% neutral0% negative
Pros
- +Probably more durable with reactx
- +Stretchy upper
- +Works for wide feet
- +Not particularly narrow for a nike shoe
- +Slept on shoe
Cons
- -Gets stiff after about 10k
- -Grip was terrible (for some)
- -Inferior to vomero plus in softness and responsiveness
- -Rubber on heel wears out
“Vomero 18 is definitely a slept on shoe. They had a sweet spot between 200-400 miles where they felt better than they had upon the first run. One of the better running shoes for walking.”