LavaPicks
Head to head · Running Shoes

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M vs Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 2

Both products have identical sentiment scores on Reddit.

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M
#4 in Running Shoes

Adidas

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M

$150.00

100

Pros

  • +Full lightstrike pro foam
  • +Improved fit with different laces
  • +Good value for money
  • +Softer ride

Cons

  • −Upper looks worn/damaged easily
  • −Unstable
  • −Not suitable for runners needing stability
  • −Lower mileage for heavier runners/forefoot strikers
“The EVO SL makes a lot of other shoes look overpriced. Evo softer and easier to pick up speed. Surprised it lasted so well over 1,000km.”
Full reviewAmazon · $150.00
Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 2
#3 in Running Shoes

Puma

Puma Fast-R Nitro Elite 2

$259.95

100

Pros

  • +Good for race day
  • +Weight not an issue for user
  • +good for long + tempo run
  • +running 4min/km seems easy and normal

Cons

  • −Potentially perceived as heavy by others
“I love my Fast R2 for long + tempo run: running 4min/km in these seems easy and normal. the foam is also great for warm up and cool down.”
r/RunningShoeGeeks
Full reviewAmazon · $259.95
← Back to Running Shoes