LavaPicks
Head to head · Running Shoes

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M vs Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 3

Reddit prefers Adidas Adizero Evo SL M — higher sentiment (100% vs 64% positive).

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M
#4 in Running ShoesReddit favorite

Adidas

Adidas Adizero Evo SL M

$150.00

100

Pros

  • +Full lightstrike pro foam
  • +Improved fit with different laces
  • +Good value for money
  • +Softer ride

Cons

  • −Upper looks worn/damaged easily
  • −Unstable
  • −Not suitable for runners needing stability
  • −Lower mileage for heavier runners/forefoot strikers
“The EVO SL makes a lot of other shoes look overpriced. Evo softer and easier to pick up speed. Surprised it lasted so well over 1,000km.”
Full reviewAmazon · $150.00
Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 3
#13 in Running Shoes

Puma

Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 3

$230.00

64

Pros

  • +wider
  • +livelier midsole
  • +good for every type of workout
  • +amazing grip

Cons

  • −wouldn't use for easy miles
  • −need to size up
  • −not much advantage when running slower
  • −Unstable for heel strikers
“The DNE3 is 99% as fast as the MSP but far more comfortable and stable. To me, they also feel more propulsive and bouncy. I have my Marathon PB of 2:56 in the DNE3.”
r/AskRunningShoeGeeks
Full reviewAmazon · $230.00
← Back to Running Shoes